Cryptothreads.io
HomeInsights

Evaluating the "Ethereum Is Dying" Narrative: What the Evidence Says

Ethereum's L1 revenue fell sharply as L2s took over activity. But the data on TVL, developers, and institutional deployments tells a more complex story.

Ledger Lynx
Ledger LynxJuly 18, 2026
Evaluating the "Ethereum Is Dying" Narrative: What the Evidence Says

Key takeaways

  • Ethereum's L1 fee revenue dropped sharply after the Dencun upgrade, a real and measurable shift with legitimate implications for ETH's value accrual model.
  • L2 networks built on Ethereum settle back to L1 for finality and security. Activity moving to L2s is not the same as activity leaving Ethereum.
  • Developer depth, DeFi TVL share, and stablecoin settlement data all remain substantially in Ethereum's favor as of mid-2026.
  • Three of the largest corporate blockchain deployments of 2023–2026 all chose Ethereum infrastructure independently of one another.
  • The fee capture problem is structurally real. The Fusaka upgrade (December 2025) introduced mechanisms to address it, but the outcome is still being tested.

Ethereum's L1 protocol revenue fell 75% year-over-year by August 2025. The network's deflationary narrative reversed as ETH supply turned inflationary again. Also, ETH underperformed Bitcoin through most of the cycle. By most financial metrics, the picture looked weak.

Yet over the same period, BlackRock launched its tokenized money market fund on Ethereum. Coinbase built its core product infrastructure on an Ethereum L2. Robinhood chose Ethereum as the settlement layer for its new blockchain. These are strategic decisions made by firms with significant due diligence processes and real capital at stake.

So, are the most-cited metrics actually measuring the right things about Ethereum's health?

What the Bearish Case Is Based On

The concern about Ethereum has specific, measurable foundations, which deserve a clear reading before anything else.

  • L1 fee revenue collapse. The Dencun upgrade in March 2024 introduced EIP-4844, creating a dedicated "blob" data channel for L2s to post transaction data to Ethereum at a fraction of the previous cost. Ethereum L1 protocol revenue fell from $157.4 million in August 2023 to $39.2 million in August 2025 – a 75% year-over-year decline. Meanwhile, Coinbase's Base L2 generated over $75 million in revenue during 2025, more than Ethereum L1 itself in that same period.
  • The deflationary narrative reversed. EIP-1559 burns ETH with every transaction, and during periods of high L1 activity this mechanism has pushed ETH toward deflation, which is a key part of the "ultrasound money" investment thesis. As L1 activity moved to L2s and blob fees stayed near zero, ETH's annualized supply growth rate turned positive at +0.22% in Q3 2025, losing that narrative.
  • ETH price underperformance. Bitcoin hit repeated all-time highs through 2024–2025 on the back of ETF inflows and a clear store-of-value framing. ETH struggled to keep pace, and the ETH/BTC ratio declined significantly from its 2021 peak. Standard Chartered analysts reduced their ETH price projections, citing lower fee burn as a structural risk (247 Wall St., 2025).
  • Growing competition for activity. Solana, BNB Chain, Tron, and newer chains captured specific categories of DeFi activity, including perpetuals trading, high-frequency consumer transactions, and stablecoin settlement, that previously would have defaulted to Ethereum. Ethereum's DeFi TVL share fell from 63.5% at the start of 2025 to approximately 53–54% by May 2026.
what the bearish case is based on
These four numbers are what the "Ethereum is dead" narrative is built on. None of them are wrong. The question is whether they're telling the whole story.

What a Declining Network Would Actually Look Like

Falling L1 fee revenue is one signal. A network that is genuinely losing relevance would show that signal alongside several others:

  • developers leaving,
  • DeFi capital migrating away,
  • stablecoin issuers moving liquidity elsewhere,
  • and institutions choosing alternative infrastructure.

The data on each of those tells a different story from the fee revenue figures.

Developer activity. Ethereum added 16,181 new developers from January to September 2025, approximately 40% more than Solana's 11,534, and more than double Bitcoin's 7,494. The total ecosystem hosts 31,869 active developers. As of March 2026, Ethereum leads all individual protocols in full-time developer headcount at 3,621, compared to Solana's 1,162. Developer concentration matters because it determines where tooling, security audits, and composable infrastructure get built.

DeFi TVL. Despite losing market share, Ethereum holds $45.4 billion in DeFi TVL as of May 2026, still the single largest chain by a significant margin. The next six chains, including Solana, BNB Chain, Bitcoin, Tron, Base, and Hyperliquid, each hold under 7% individually. Ethereum's share decline from 63.5% to 53–54% reflects a more distributed market, not a collapse of the underlying activity.

Stablecoin settlement. Ethereum and its L2s account for 61–62% of the total global stablecoin market, approximately $184 billion of a $300 billion total. Stablecoin issuers and payment infrastructure providers choose settlement layers based on security guarantees and liquidity depth, not price momentum.

is ethereum dead
These are the metrics that tend to get skipped when the "Ethereum is dead" narrative runs. Each one measured independently, each pointing the same direction.

The L2 Relationship: What "Activity Moving Off L1" Means

The framing of Layer 2 networks as a threat to Ethereum conflates two different things: where user-facing activity happens, and where finality and security are recorded.

Every transaction on an Ethereum L2 ultimately settles back to Ethereum L1. Finality, the definitive and tamper-resistant record of what occurred, is written to Ethereum. L2 networks do not maintain their own security. They inherit it from Ethereum L1. When L2 activity grows, Ethereum's role as the settlement and security layer grows with it.

The dynamic resembles a layered financial system, where most day-to-day activity flows through intermediary institutions while the foundational settlement layer handles final clearing. Lower direct usage of the clearing layer may indicate the system has scaled as intended.

Coinbase's Base L2 illustrates this at scale. In 2025, Base captured over 60% of all Ethereum L2 revenue and processed more than $17 trillion in stablecoin volume. As of April 2026, Base holds approximately $4.4 billion in TVL with monthly active users peaking at 34.5 million in mid-2025. Every one of those transactions settles on Ethereum.

The fee capture problem (L2s generate economic value while Ethereum L1 earns little from blob fees) is nonetheless real. This is a structural issue with legitimate implications for ETH holders, separate from the question of whether Ethereum's network is losing relevance.

ethereum is dying
Base processed $17 trillion in stablecoin volume in 2025. Every single transaction settled on Ethereum L1 – the chain that "lost" the activity.

Three Independent Institutional Decisions

The clearest evidence for how institutional actors actually assess Ethereum is the infrastructure choices they made under business conditions.

Coinbase launched Base, its strategic L2, on Ethereum in 2023. The decision was made at the executive level by a company with deep familiarity with multiple blockchain options. The logic was consistent with how Ethereum L2s work. Coinbase gained control over its product environment and fee economics without needing to bootstrap a new validator set, bridge infrastructure, and liquidity base from scratch. Base subsequently became a significant revenue stream and the foundation for Coinbase's stablecoin payments strategy.

BlackRock chose Ethereum as the launch chain for BUIDL, its tokenized money market fund, in March 2024. The fund grew from $40 million at launch to over $1.8 billion on-chain by late 2025. BlackRock later expanded BUIDL to other chains in response to institutional client preferences, but Ethereum remained the primary security anchor for the fund.

Robinhood launched Robinhood Chain on July 1, 2026, as an Arbitrum-based Ethereum L2. The chain uses ETH as its native gas token, Ethereum blobs for data availability, and Ethereum L1 for finality and security. Robinhood first deployed Stock Tokens on Arbitrum One in June 2025 to validate demand before launching its own chain – a deliberate sequencing that reflects the same cost-benefit calculation Coinbase made in 2023. Within two weeks of launch, Robinhood Chain processed over $877 million in daily DEX volume.

Three companies, three independent decisions, the same underlying infrastructure choice. The common thread is that Ethereum's combination of operational track record, neutral governance, developer tooling, and liquidity depth cleared a threshold that alternatives did not.

The Fee Problem and Ethereum's Response

The gap between L2 economic activity and L1 fee revenue was a recognized problem within the Ethereum developer community, and the Fusaka upgrade, activated on December 3, 2025, directly addressed its structural cause.

The core economic fix was EIP-7918, which introduced a minimum reserve price for blob fees. Before Fusaka, blob fees could fall to near-zero regardless of L2 activity, because blob supply consistently exceeded demand after Dencun. EIP-7918 tied the minimum blob fee to L1 gas pricing, preventing the market from becoming structurally ineffective.

Analysis from Fidelity Digital Assets found that on 93% of days since the Dencun upgrade, the adjusted fee under EIP-7918 would have exceeded the observed fee. Had the mechanism been active since Dencun, it would have generated an estimated additional $78.6 million in cumulative revenue. Blockworks noted at the time of activation that if EIP-7918 had been introduced on June 1, 2025, burnt blob fees would have been nearly 8x higher.

Fusaka also introduced PeerDAS, which reduces node bandwidth requirements by up to 85% while enabling an 8x increase in blob capacity. The intended outcome is a reinforcing dynamic: lower costs for L2s increase adoption, which increases total blob usage, which increases fee revenue to L1, reversing the one-directional pressure that Dencun had created.

Bottom Line

The "Ethereum is dying" framing tends to rely on a specific subset of metrics and treat them as representative of the network's overall trajectory. A broader set of metrics points in a different direction. What remains genuinely open is the ETH token's value accrual model. A network can maintain settlement-layer relevance while its native asset captures less of the resulting economic value than investors expect.

The evidence through mid-2026 does not support "dying" as an accurate description of Ethereum's network. It does support "structurally evolving in ways that complicate the original investment thesis", which is a different, and more precise, claim.

Sources and Further Reading

Disclaimer:The content published on Cryptothreads does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. We are not financial advisors, and any opinions, analysis, or recommendations provided are purely informational. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile, and investing in digital assets carries substantial risk. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Cryptothreads is not liable for any financial losses or damages resulting from actions taken based on our content.
ethereum
eth
store of value
layer 2

FAQs

ETH is used to pay for everything that happens on Ethereum, from gas fees and blob data to staking collateral and DeFi collateral. If settlement activity on Ethereum grows but blob fees stay near zero, ETH demand doesn't necessarily follow. That's the core of the fee capture debate: settlement-layer status doesn't automatically translate into ETH price appreciation.

Ledger Lynx
WRITTEN BYLedger LynxLedger Lynx is a market analyst at Cryptothreads specializing in crypto market structure, on-chain analytics, and ecosystem-level developments across the digital asset industry. His research focuses on identifying the structural forces shaping crypto markets, including capital flows, developer migration, protocol adoption, and regulatory dynamics. By combining on-chain data analysis with ecosystem research and macro context, Ledger Lynx examines how emerging narratives and technological shifts influence market behavior beyond short-term price movements. At Cryptothreads, he contributes analytical articles exploring blockchain ecosystems, protocol evolution, and market trends across major crypto networks. His work aims to provide readers with a deeper understanding of the underlying drivers behind crypto market cycles, adoption patterns, and the long-term development of the digital asset economy.
FOLLOWLedger Lynx
XFacebook

More articles by

Ledger Lynx

Hot Topic